Week 4 Understanding Emotion Discussion

Week 4 Understanding Emotion Discussion

Hi, I have 3 of my classmates’ posts. I need you to respond to each one separately. Also, one source at least for each one of them. Don’t write about how good their posts or how bad. All you need to do is to choose one point of the post and explore it a little bit with one source support for each response. The paper should be APA style.

The question was:

(DB

wk
4) Understanding Emotion – a continuing dialogue

Listen to Invisobilia (NPR) Podcast from June 1, 2017 titled “Emotions: Part 1”: http://www.npr.org/2017/06/01/530928414/emotions-p…

~ it is sometimes easier to listen while driving, doing chores like folding laundry or doing dishes!

1. What struck you about the contents of this podcast?
2. Some of the ideas about emotions and the way trauma impacts the brain might be controversial. How did you react to these ideas?
3. How would you challenge them or how might you be intrigued to explore more? .

NOTE: Please be respectful of different viewpoints, experiences, and reflections. Be open-minded in order to learn from each other’s

points
of view.

This the first post from my classmate IBRAHIM need for response

:

Understanding Emotions

The podcast illustrates the description of emotions and how the human brain responds to reactions. The podcast starts with a discussion of the effects of emotion in human life and how it affects the future of a person. For instance, Tommy grew up knowing that a man should not be controlled by emotions, and his father used to force him to be strong and tough. On the other hand, Amanda grew up knowing that it was okay to be emotional and reactive towards what life offered. Both Amanda and Tommy grew up having different perspectives towards emotions and how to control them (National Public Radio, 2017). The issue was how their later life affected both individuals due to the different definitions of emotions. After the accident, Amanda was the victim due to the loss of her baby, but one year later, Tommy sued Amanda and her husband for the trauma they caused. The incident was absurd. At first, I thought they were joking about Tommy suing Amanda imagining how the family who had lost their baby would feel. And the ridiculous thing is that Tommy won the case. Understanding emotions are hard, but I came to realize how theoretical approaches and scientific perspectives work to explain emotions and the causes of trauma.

Additionally, I listened to the podcast more than one time intending to understand how emotions are explained. Barrett helped in explaining her psychological perspective towards emotions and trauma. Trauma is caused by emotions. Emotions are the reflexes that

strike
in the human brain, which might be caused by different situations. For example, Amanda was emotional after she learned that her daughter had died in the accident. She was supposed to react that way based on her loss. But, the victim of trauma after the accident was Tommy, who claimed to have succumbed to PTSD. Tommy’s arguments were based on the images that kept flashing in his mind of the young girl’s hand swinging outside the window of the car during the accident. He knew he had killed a person who affected his judgments for more than a year (National Public Radio, 2017). However, the involvement of childhood memories and teachings about emotions would have a minimal effect on how people handle trauma and stress. For instance, the arguments supporting Tommy’s traumatized situation while Amanda is

unbothered
is irrelevant, whereby some people would not support the arguments. Also, it would be difficult to rely on past experiences to define current emotional situations. I could not agree with the arguments supporting how Tommy was the victim in the situation, and he could not control his emotions for almost a year.

Moreover, the strategy of understanding the involvement of emotions in trauma is not described effectively based on the arguments presented in the case of Amanda and Tommy. For example, Amanda was the victim in the case as she lost her child during the accident, but the beneficiary was Tommy who argued that he lost emotional control, which has never happened in his life, and he needed compensation. His arguments towards the case were relevant based on his loss of wages, but Tommy could not have thought of the situation were it not his lawyer’s ideas (National Public Radio, 2017). Also, I would challenge the case due to the duty of a person to be responsible for their happiness. Emotions are generated internally and triggered by situations, but someone could not blame another person due to their sorrows or trauma. For example, Tommy blamed Amanda’s husband for reckless driving, which caused the accident and affected Tommy for almost a year. Therefore, I would have revisited the case, and Tommy would not have won the litigation because all he needed was therapy during the first month after the accident.

References

National Public Radio.

(
2017, June 1). Emotions [Audio blog post]. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.npr.org/2017/06/01/530928414/emotions-…

This the second post from my classmate AHMED need for response

:

The Podcast

One important point that stood out in Invisibilia’spodcast, “Emotions: Part 1”, is that human emotions emanate from both good and bad past events. It gives illustrations that provide a new perspective on human emotions contrary to what most people believe. Fundamentally, emotions are perceived to be automatic responses to what happens to a person in his or her immediate environment. The podcast, however, provides a differing viewpoint as the discussion looks at the role of external factors such as trauma and how it affects brain functions. The podcast proves that a traumatic event may be a source of emotional dysfunction, although it may take a long time to be exhibited by the victim, for instance, in the case of Tommy. Despite the common view that emotions are a response to one’s immediate environment, the podcast reveals that the reaction may take a long time to manifest.

Impact of Trauma on the Brain

The podcast’s explanation of emotions and how trauma affects the brain contravenes the general belief. The psychologist believes that emotions are not a reaction to what goes on around a

person but
rather a determinant of what they go through daily. Tommy’s engagement in the lawsuit reveals how the accident had negatively affected his normal brain functions and his life as a whole. Even though Amanda and Michael were profoundly affected by the accident, Tommy’s case shows how emotional distress can be as bad as physical damage. As Vernberg at al.

(
2008) point out, the idea that the brain develops a theory

from
experience leading to trauma is not a clear explanation for trauma. Therefore, Tommy’s perception and legal arguments raise a new understanding of how emotions work, contrary to ordinary beliefs.

Response to the Podcast

The

environment people
live in significantly affects our emotions due to the

stressors
and traumatic events they meet. The accident case discussed in the podcast raises interesting questions concerning post-traumatic stress events and the way they shape emotions. It would be intriguing to explore how time determines emotional distress as the case was for Tommy. Studying whether time reduces or changes a person’s perception and reaction to trauma regarding how they emotionally perceive an event can help unravel the response that Tommy had. As Halpern and Vermeulen (2017) point out, the more a person is frightened, the more likely they are to experience trauma. In the lawsuit after the accident, it is evident that Tommy reacts out of fear.

Conclusion

Despite the popular view that emotions are a response to a person’s immediate environment, Tommy’s experience in the podcast reveals that the reaction may take a long time to manifest. The podcast shows that emotions are not a mere reaction to what goes on around a

person but
rather a determinant of what they go through daily. For example, Tommy’s case raises interesting questions regarding how post-traumatic stress events shape emotions and future studies should explore how time determines emotional distress.

References

Halpern, J., & Vermeulen, K. (2017). Disaster mental health interventions: Core principles and practices. Routledge.

Vernberg, E. M., Steinberg, A. M., Jacobs, A. K., Brymer, M. J., Watson, P. J., Osofsky, J. D.,… & Ruzek, J. I. (2008). Innovations in disaster mental health: Psychological first aid. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

,
39

(
4), 381.

This the third post from my classmate SALEH need for respons

e
:

There are several things that have struck me regarding the podcast. To begin with, I realize that there are many people, just like I, who have been brought up in a way that inhibits the expression of emotions. There are many people who live hiding their emotions Just like Tommy and Thornberry. Tommy was taught by his father that one should control emotions by not letting them be seen. Thornberry also learned from a young age to keep a straight face that hides all emotions. Additionally, it is surprising to see how the law identifies with emotion such as the Tommy Jarret case where he won a case which he sued a family for emotional pain incurred due to a car accident.

Tommy Jarret suffered emotional distress after an accident that took over control of his body and mind. This was as a result of post-traumatic stress disorder. The disorder had wrecked his life in the same way that a physical injury can break one’s life. This is an intense revelation on the importance of emotions to man’s life. As such, emotions are hard to control and they can be triggered by a myriad of activities. However, there is a need to have a healthy coping mechanism for emotions as they can be devastating.

Trauma can be devastating to a person. To begin with, I was surprised at the extent to which trauma can cause injury to a person and their life. This made me realize the importance or impact of certain life events on a person. These events can be crippling in a way that is not visible to the human eye or easily recognizable. Additionally, to state that trauma can have an impact on a person that is equivalent to spinal injuries looks like an overstatement. But using Jarret’s story and perspective it is clearly visible that trauma indeed can have some devastating effects.

In the beginning, I would challenge that there is no way that a stranger can suffer more than a parent for the loss of a child. I mean, a child who the stranger has never seen before. The story highlights this new perspective that I am interested in exploring. Through the story of Jarret and Makayla, I am interested in exploring the various effects that the loss of a child can have on a stranger and the parent by making a comparison list. This list can show the major impacts that a loss can have on a parent vis-à-vis a person who suffers endless guilt for the loss of the child.

"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.

Discount Code: CIPD30

Click ORDER NOW..