Week 2 case study

Week 2 case study

Assignment Instructions

Week 2 Case Vignette Analysis #1

Throughout the course, various theories and concepts related to assessment of emergency and crisis situations will be presented. The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for learners to demonstrate the ability to analyze crisis and emergency situations, applying appropriate assessment, intervention, and treatment plan options in practical scenarios, articulating clear rationale for the decisions made.

To complete Case Vignette Analysis #1, assume you are in the role and case study scenario described below.

• ROLE: Mental Health Professional in a rural community with nobehavioral health center, safe house, or in-place support systems.
• CASE STUDY: Carol has been your client for 4 sessions and recently disclosed the abusive nature of her 25-year marriage. She alleges her husband has struck her and she is fearful of his rage episodes. She also suspects that he is viewing child pornography on their computer, but has been unable to substantiate. They have a daughter with 2 granddaughters ages 6 and 4. Her husband is a well-respected businessman in the very small, geographically isolated community and frontier county of less than 2000 residents. He is also a Scout leader and buddies with the County Sheriff. The couple attends church semi-regularly, belonging to a dominant patriarchal religion in the area. She is unable to go to church authorities with her suspicions and complaints as is the expected practice, because the last visit to her religious counselors resulted in intensified abuse afterward and a reprimand by the religious leader for being a poor wife. Carol calls you at 10:00 pm one Friday night with terror in her voice and informs you she has left her husband, but knows he will come looking for her. Her personal funds are limited, and she is driving a high-visibility vehicle. From the panic noted in her call, there is little question that she feels she is in danger.

In responding to the case presented, implement the following:

• Provide your assessment using the ABCDE Assessment Model in the Collins text.
• Describe your detailed six-step, single-session crisis intervention using the intervention model.
• Outline your ongoing crisis management and intervention goals.

Include a minimum 7 to 8 pages, not including APA formatted required title and reference pages; submit APA style in-text citations throughout the work as well.

The basic parts of a paper should also be included; these are the opening, introduction section, with a precise thesis statement, the body of the paper with clear, discernable headings formatted to APA style levels of heading where appropriate, and a conclusion that restates the thesis and summarizes the major points of the entire paper.

The APUS Library provides APA formatting resources at Writing@APUS. You may also see Purdue’s OWL https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/for general APA formatting information and for formatting help on many topics.

All submissions are due by the end of Week 2, Sunday at 11:55 pm ET.

See the Grading Rubric Below

Criterion	Excellent	Satisfactory	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory	Score
Analysis of Case 50 points possible	Student provides a thorough analysis of the assigned case, critically evaluating each component, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of related theory and concepts.	Student analyzes the assigned case, evaluating most components, demonstrating an adequate understanding of related theory and concepts.	Student provides a marginal analysis of the assigned case, demonstrating an acceptable understanding of related theory and concepts.	The work does not reflect an acceptable analysis of the assigned case.
Practical Application 50 points possible	Student identifies and explains selected assessment, intervention, and treatment methods, each of which is aligned with identified parameters of the case.	Student identifies and explains selected assessment, intervention, and treatment methods, alignment with case parameters may not be present.	Student identifies selected methods, these may not be explained or aligned with the case parameters.	The work does not include application practical application of assessment, intervention, and treatment methods.
Support 20 possible points	Course materials and other scholarly sources are used to support assertions.	Course materials are used to support some assertions in the work.	Assertions in the work are not supported by evidence.	Work is based upon opinion only.
Writing 15 possible points	Work is presented in a logical and coherent way. Writing is clear, articulate, and error free.	Work is grammatically sound with a few minor errors.	Work contains frequent grammatical errors.	Significant grammatical errors within the work severely affect the readability.
Formatting 15 possible points	APA formatting is complete, with all required paper elements accurately noted.	APA formatting is complete with some minor errors.	Work contains incomplete and inaccurate APA formatting.	Work contains no formatting.
Total 150 possible points

"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.

Discount Code: CIPD30

WHATSAPP CHAT: +1 (781) 253-4162

Click ORDER NOW..