Victoria Secret Transphobic and Fat Shaming Fallacy Presentation
Victoria Secret Transphobic and Fat Shaming Fallacy Presentation
Assignment: For Part 1, you are expected to examine 1 of 4 texts that makes an argument about the shaming of others. Although understanding the rhetor’s argument is important, ultimately your goal is to determine whether the rhetor has avoided or committed fallacies as they develop their position.
Your 4 choices, I will provide them to you
- CharlieVlogs. “Cancer Research Hates Fat People (Sofie Hagen)”
- Khan, Sarah. “Manspreading Is an Important Feminist Issue, Not Just Bad Social Etiquette”
- Queen Chioma, “Is Victoria Secret Transphobic + Fat-Shaming?”
- Thornhill, Bryan. “Good Parenting”
Once you select a text, you are then expected to apply 1 fallacy of ethos covered in McIntyre and McKee’s text( I will provide it), 2 of the following 3 fallacies of logos—hasty generalization, faulty analogy, and slippery slope—covered in the “Collection of Fallacies of Argument,” and 1 fallacy of pathos of your choice from that same document. Essentially, you are attempting to determine whether the rhetor has avoided fallacious ethos, logos, and pathos in their argument or has committed errors as they attempt to appeal to their audience.
Requirements: Your critical assessment of how well the rhetor has avoided fallacious ethos, logos, and pathos is expected to be in the form of a Presentation, namely PowerPoint or Google Slides or Prezi.
- The first slide of your 10-slide Presentation should be an appropriate title slide and contain the title of your Presentation and the name of the presenter.
- The second slide should be a section heading slide whose job it is to introduce the rhetor and text you’ve selected.
- In slides 3 and 4, provide information about the speaker’s credentials on the topic they are addressing (slide 3) and the central and important supporting claims they are making as well as detail about the audience they are addressing (slide 4).
- On slide 5, create a sectional heading slide that articulates your claim about whether the rhetor has used fallacious ethos and logos or has avoided making such errors.
- For slide 6, work with 1 fallacy of ethos from McIntyre and McKee’s text. Define the fallacy, provide evidence that the rhetor has committed or avoided making the error, and explain how this impacts the author’s argument. (Slide 6—fallacious ethos # 1).
- For slides 7 & 8, work with 2 different fallacies of logos from “Collection of Fallacies of Argument.” Again, define the fallacy, provide evidence that the rhetor has committed or avoided making the error, and explain how this impacts the rhetor’s argument. (Slide 7—fallacious logos # 1, slide 8—fallacious logos # 2).
- For slide 9, work with 1 fallacy of pathos of your choice. Define the fallacy, provide evidence that the rhetor has committed or avoided making the error, and explain how this impacts the author’s argument. (Slide 9—fallacious ethos # 1).
- For the final slide, end by considering a specific question introduced to us in Chapter 7 of They Say/I Say: “Why does any of this matter?”
- Visuals that are relevant to the subject matter addressed by the rhetor should be integrated into a minimum of 3 slides and a maximum of 6.
- Use emphasis strategies—font size, color, shading, and placement—that make it easy for your audience to follow your analysis of the rhetor’s ethos and logos.
"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.
Discount Code: CIPD30
Click ORDER NOW..


