leadership action plan Power Point Slideshow

leadership action plan Power Point Slideshow

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle slideSlide contains pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member.

10.0 pts
Slide contains all pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member

9.0 pts
Slide contains most information; however, one component is missing.

8.0 pts
Slide contains most information; however, two to three components are missing.

4.0 pts
Slide contains some information; and more than three components are missing or slide is missing.

0.0 pts
Title slide is missing.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAn issue is determined based on the National Patient Safety Goals 2019 PDF and there are facts with support from references explaining why it is an issue. References are used.

20.0 pts
At least three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the issue selected based on the National Patient Safety Goals. References are used.

18.0 pts
Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the National Patient Safety Goals. References are included.

16.0 pts
One reason is included and is logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the National Patient Safety Goal. Few references are used.

8.0 pts
One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the patient’s perspective. No references are used.

0.0 pts
No reasons given to support why the issue is a concern or issue is not a National Patient Safety Goal.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLists the stakeholders (people) who are involved in the issue and explains how each role will contribute to the problem solution

30.0 pts
At least three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

26.0 pts
Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

24.0 pts
One reason is included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

11.0 pts
One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the potential staff member’s perspective.

0.0 pts
No reasons are given to recommend hospital care to potential staff members.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss solutions to the problem weighing the stakeholders, cost, and reachable outcomes of each solution.

30.0 pts
Three solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution are noted thoroughly and clearly.

26.0 pts
Two solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution are noted clearly.

24.0 pts
Two solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution is briefly discussed, omitting some information.

11.0 pts
One solution is listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the solution is noted.

0.0 pts
No solutions are noted or discussed.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePicks one solution to share with the director and discusses why this solution was chosen over the others.

30.0 pts
One solution is chosen. Thoroughly describes why this solution was better than the other one and supports this idea clearly with a reference.

26.0 pts
One solution is chosen. Mostly describes why this solution was better than the other one and supports this idea clearly with a reference.

24.0 pts
One solution is chosen. Briefly describes why this solution was better than the other one but lacks clear support for this idea. Does not use a reference.

11.0 pts
One solution is chosen. Description is not clear and does not explain why the other solution was not chosen. No references were used.

0.0 pts
No solution was chosen or described. No references were used.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeShares best approach to deliver solution to director and staff.

30.0 pts
Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is thoroughly described in detail.

26.0 pts
Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is somewhat described in detail.

24.0 pts
Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is briefly described in detail.

11.0 pts
Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is described but difficult to ascertain.

0.0 pts
Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is not noted.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of issue, plan, and desired outcome for the plan is clear and relates to the previous slides.

20.0 pts
Summary is clear and relates to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement and desired outcomes.

18.0 pts
Summary is noted and relates to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes.

16.0 pts
Summary is briefly noted and may or may not relate to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes.

8.0 pts
Summary is not clear and may or may not relate to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes. Some pieces may be omitted.

0.0 pts
No summary is completed.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection of learning is displayed with lists, bulleted items, or other creative ways.

20.0 pts
Thoroughly reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

18.0 pts
Generally reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

16.0 pts
Briefly reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

8.0 pts
Minimally reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment does NOT include value of data.

0.0 pts
Reflection on learning related leadership action plan assignment including value of data, is missing or so brief that understanding of concepts is difficult to ascertain.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and formatting. Slides are provided and labeled appropriately. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check. References are in APA format.

10.0 pts
All slides are provided and grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check. References are in correct APA format

9.0 pts
Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. Minimal indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are in correct APA format

8.0 pts
Several errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are several indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are not in correct APA format

5.0 pts
Numerous errors in punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are many indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are not in correct APA format

0.0 pts
Many errors in writing to the extent that it is difficult to understand the meaning of the information presented on the slides. References are not in correct APA format

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeaker Notes Present

0.0 pts
Speaker Notes Present – no deduction in points

0.0 pts
Speaker notes not present on 80% of the slides results in a 10% deduction (20 points).

0.0 pts

Total Points: 200.0

"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.


Discount Code: CIPD30


WHATSAPP CHAT: +1 (781) 253-4162


Click ORDER NOW..

order custom paper