knowledge management 1 answer below »
knowledge management 1 answer below »
Knowledge Management
Details:
As a practitioner, you must be able to create and communicate a compelling awareness of a need for effective knowledge management in an organization. For this assignment, you will create a research-based communication strategy for an upcoming knowledge management initiative.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Use APA style for their writing assignments. This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words that presents a research-based communication strategy to facilitate buy-in and create awareness in the company about the impending knowledge management initiative. Include the following in your paper:
1. A brief description of the strategy.
2. A research-based rationale for the strategy.
3. A discussion of how to overcome the potential barriers to the strategy.
4. A plan for measuring the short-term success of the strategy.
5.
RUBRIC
Knowledge Management
1Unsatisfactory0.00%
2Less Than Satisfactory74.00%
3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good87.00%
5Excellent100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Description of the Strategy
A description of the strategy is either missing or not evident to the reader.
A description of the strategy is present but incomplete.
A description of the strategy is present but description is cursory and lacking depth.
A thorough description of the strategy is given.
A description of the strategy is given clearly. Description is insightful and contains rich detail. Presentation demonstrates a firm grasp of course material.
15.0 %Research-Based Rationale for the Strategy
A research-based rationale for the strategy is either not present or not evident to the reader.
A research-based rationale for the strategy is present, but sources used are not scholarly.
A research-based rationale for the strategy is present but cursory and lacking depth of logic. Sources are both non-scholarly and scholarly.
A research-based rationale for the strategy is presented clearly. Rationale is thorough and convincing. Research is from highly regarded sources. Most are authoritative but some are outdated.
A research-based rationale for the strategy is presented clearly. Rationale is insightful and discerning, demonstrating a firm grasp of course material. Research is from highly respected, current sources.
15.0 %Discussion of How to Overcome Potential Barriers to the Strategy
A discussion of how to overcome potential barriers to the strategy is either not present or not evident to the reader.
A discussion of how to overcome potential barriers to the strategy is present, but incomplete.
A discussion of how to overcome potential barriers to the strategy is cursory and lacking depth.
A discussion of how to overcome potential barriers to the strategy is presented clearly. Discussion is thorough and convincing. Research is from highly regarded sources. Most are authoritative but some are outdated.
A discussion of how to overcome potential barriers to the strategy is presented clearly. Discussion is insightful and discerning, demonstrating a firm grasp of course material. Research is from highly respected, current sources.
15.0 %Plan for Measuring the Short-Term Success of the Strategy
A plan for measuring the short-term success of the strategy is either not present or not evident to the reader.
A plan for measuring the short-term success of the strategy is present, but incomplete.
A plan for measuring the short-term success of the strategy is present but cursory and lacking depth.
A plan for measuring the short-term success of the strategy is presented clearly. The plan is thorough and uses research from highly regarded sources. Most are authoritative but some are outdated.
A plan for measuring the short-term success of the strategy is presented clearly. The plan is insightful and discerning, demonstrating a firm grasp of course material. Research support is from highly respected, current sources.
10.0 %Synthesis and Argument
No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources.
Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber.
25.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
20.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing
Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
5.0 %APA Format
Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Required correctly format is used, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.
100 %Total Weightage
"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.
Discount Code: CIPD30
Click ORDER NOW..
