Interview and Leadership Analysis – Nursing Writings
Interview and Leadership Analysis – Nursing Writings
7/27/2021 Interview and Leadership Analysis Scoring Guide
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NHS/NHS8040/200700/Scoring_Guides/u03a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1
Interview and Leadership Analysis Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 3Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Evaluate the primaryleadership style of aselected leader in ahealth caremanagementposition.
17%
Does not evaluatethe primaryleadership style ofa selected leaderin a health caremanagementposition.
Describes but doesevaluate the primaryleadership style of aselected leader in ahealth caremanagement position.
Evaluates theprimaryleadership styleof a selectedleader in ahealth caremanagementposition.
Evaluates the primary leadershipstyle of a selected leader in ahealth care management position;notes strengths and growthopportunities.
Assess a leader’srole in anorganization as itrelates to quality,safety, and evidence-based standards.
17%
Does not assessa leader’s role inan organization asit relates toquality, safety,and evidence-based standards.
Assesses a leader’srole in an organizationas it relates to quality,safety, and evidence-based standards butthe discussion isunclear or incomplete.
Assesses aleader’s role inan organizationas it relates toquality, safety,and evidence-basedstandards.
Assesses a leader’s role in anorganization as it relates to quality,safety, and evidence-basedstandards; provides relevantexamples of successes, strategies,or best practices that supportassertions.
Explain the rationalefor the selection of aleader to serve as apreceptor.
17%
Does not explainthe rationale forthe selection of aleader to serve asa preceptor.
Identifies a leader butdoes not explain therationale for theselection of the leaderto serve as apreceptor.
Explains therationale for theselection of aleader to serveas a preceptor.
Explains the rationale for theselection of a leader to serve as apreceptor and provides a qualitativeevaluation of the selected leader’squalifications andaccomplishments.
Identify a gap,problem, oropportunity for acapstone project.
17%
Does not identifya gap, problem, oropportunity for acapstone project.
Identifies a gap,problem, or opportunityfor a capstone projectbut the work is unclearor incomplete.
Identifies a gap,problem, oropportunity for acapstone project.
Identifies a gap, problem, oropportunity for a capstone projectthat is clear, concise, anddemonstrates a comprehensiveunderstanding of the issue.
Summarize a leader’sability to provideethical stewardshipand oversightregarding the ethicaluse of organizationalinformation.16%
Does notsummarize aleader’s ability toprovide ethicalstewardship andoversightregarding theethical use oforganizationalinformation.
Partially describes aleader’s ability toprovide ethicalstewardship andoversight regarding theethical use oforganizationalinformation.
Summarizes aleader’s ability toprovide ethicalstewardship andoversightregarding theethical use oforganizationalinformation.
Summarizes a leader’s ability toprovide ethical stewardship andoversight regarding the ethical useof organizational information,including specific examples tosupport assertions.
Convey purpose, inan appropriate toneand style,incorporatingsupporting evidenceand adhering toorganizational,professional, andscholarly writingstandards.
16%
Does not conveypurpose in anappropriate toneand style. Doesnot incorporatesupportingevidence noradhere toorganizational,professional, orscholarly writingstandards.
Conveys purpose, inan appropriate tone orstyle. Clear, effectivecommunication isinhibited by insufficientsupporting evidenceand/or minimaladherence toorganizational,professional, orscholarly writingstandards.
Conveyspurpose, in anappropriate toneand style,incorporatingsupportingevidence andadhering toorganizational,professional, andscholarly writingstandards.
Conveys clear purpose, in a toneand style well-suited to the intendedaudience. Supports assertions,arguments, and conclusions withrelevant, credible, and convincingevidence. Exhibits strict and nearlyflawless adherence toorganizational, professional, andscholarly writing standards,including APA style and formatting.
"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.
Discount Code: CIPD30
Click ORDER NOW..
