HLSS500 WK7 Data Analysis Tool & Qualitative Comparative Analysis Paper
HLSS500 WK7 Data Analysis Tool & Qualitative Comparative Analysis Paper
Responses should be a minimum of 250 words and include direct questions. You may challenge, support or supplement another student’s answer using the terms, concepts and theories from the required readings. Also, do not be afraid to respectfully disagree where you feel appropriate; as this should be part of your analysis process at this academic level.
Respond to Amy:
The research design being conducted in my study is a multi pronged approach of both quantitative and qualitative data. Therefore, the study will utilize mixed methods research design. Due to the fact that the research of the border security measures being taken is constantly on going, one can only gather so much statistical data during the given time periods of 2001 to present day. With this being said, hard facts from previous studies need to be utilized to further justify the hypothesis that the well-being of the United States is in high standings since the terrorist attacks in 2001.
In order to fully support the hypothesis and thesis of the study, using a multi-phase mixed method approach allows one to analyze all factors of each focal group and its impact on the overall variables. One cannot make a credible study if one does not thoroughly examine all research and data provided from multiple approaches. Each variable will be evaluated in correlation to quantitative data and qualitative data without directly utilizing human subjects. All research will be drawn from previous works and as much numerical data as humanely possible.
Qualitative Comparative Analysis will be used in order to examine combinations of characteristics in case studies conducted from previous researchers. With this comparative analysis, the study will take the variables of surplus of law enforcement personnel and infrastructure security, break it down, and correlate the outcome of the presence or absence of the focal groups. For instance, if there was not an increase in law enforcement personnel, would deterrence be obsolete and the crime rate be increased at the country’s borders? There are several studies and research available that can make these comparisons in an efficient and effective fashion.
Another data analysis tool used in the study as a quantitative approach is validity and reliability. The statistical data in the study needs to specifically correlate to the thesis provided. With this being said, inter-item reliability is used to take multiple items to measure a sole ideal. The numerical data gathered from multiple sources, to include the Customs and Border Patrol HQ, all demonstrate that over the years, the apprehensions, the drug smuggling, and the immigration has dwindled greatly since the terrorist attacks in 2001. In order to support this ideal, one cannot solely take numerical data from one source and justify its worth in the study. Multiple sources need to be gathered in order to grasp the single concept that the increase of border security is justifying the United States’ well-being. Face validity is used in this study as well so that the statistical data being used looks like what it is supposed to measure. That the numbers being provided are valid at face value. That there is no room to assume otherwise. The numbers of apprehensions, drugs, and immigration by the CBP reflects this face validity.
One type of data collection that will be used is the Social Historical type. This type of collection is needed in order to gather elements of examination during the specific time period of September 11th 2001 to present day. The data being collected in this arena are solidified facts of the executive orders that were dropped from various Presidents in order to create a higher border security recognition and create room to correct issues at all borders. This justifies the theoretical explanations of what segments created a shift in securing the United States’ well-being and safety.
Content Analysis is conducted in this research in order to break down what integral actions were made to support the theory that deterrence played a role in the United States’ safety and border security. Content analysis is needed to decompose what the researcher needs within categories that are applicable to their study. Through this type of data collection, the study was able to be broken down six categories; importance of border security, increase of law enforcement at borders, increase of infrastructure security, impact on drug smuggling, impact on immigration, and impact on trade. Within each content, the study can be directed to reach the appropriate theory. Without these contents, the hypothesis of the study would not be whole hearteningly supported due to the lack of information being given.
"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.
Discount Code: CIPD30
Click ORDER NOW..
