Herzing University Online Wk 7 Electronic Health Record
Herzing University Online Wk 7 Electronic Health Record
Unit 7 Assignment – EMR Documentation
Submit Assignment
Due Jun 23 by 11:59pm
Points
200
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Instructions
Taking short-cuts in any profession can be a risk, but when it comes to
health
record documentation, short-cuts can impact the patient, provider, and
health care
entity. You are the clinical operations manager of the new surgical center.
You manage all physicians and other ancillary providers. You discover that no formal policy exists regarding “best practices” for EMR documentation.
Create
a 2-3 page policy on EMR Best Practices
Include an introductory paragraph explaining the purpose of the policy.
Divide the policy contents into two sections: administrative staff, and clinical staff.
Include at least three best practices (some of these may be the same for both administrative and clinical staff, but you should strive to identify specific best practices for each group).
Include at least four (two for admin, two for clinical staff) common mistakes, short-cuts, etc. and how and why to avoid them.
Your policy should use formal and professional verbiage.
On a separate page, list a minimum of three references in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit:
EMR Best Practices documentation – Word document (.doc) or PDF
Rubric
Unit 7 Assignment: EMR Documentation (1)
Unit 7 Assignment: EMR Documentation (1)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
20.0 pts
5
Includes a comprehensive and well-written introduction that clearly and succinctly explains an accurate purpose for the policy.
18.0 pts
4
Includes a well-written introduction that clearly and succinctly explains an accurate purpose for the policy.
16.0 pts
3
Includes a somewhat well-written introduction that clearly explains an accurate purpose for the policy.
14.0 pts
2
Includes a somewhat well-written introduction that minimally explains a purpose for the policy.
12.0 pts
1
Includes a brief introduction that inaccurately explains a purpose for the policy.
0.0 pts
0
Does not provide an introduction.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdministrative Staff
75.0 pts
5
Identifies and accurately describes 3 or more best practices; correctly identifies 4 or more common mistakes; clearly and correctly describes multiple ways to avoid mistakes.
67.0 pts
4
Identifies and accurately describes at least 3 best practices; correctly identifies at least 4 common mistakes; correctly describes some ways to avoid mistakes.
60.0 pts
3
Identifies and accurately describes 2-3 best practices; correctly identifies 3- 4 common mistakes; correctly describes at least one way to avoid mistakes.
52.0 pts
2
Identifies and somewhat inaccurately describes 2-3 best practices; somewhat incorrectly identifies 3- 4 common mistakes; or incorrectly describes ways to avoid mistakes.
45.0 pts
1
Inaccurately describes best practices; incorrectly identifies common mistakes; and incorrectly describes ways to avoid mistakes.
0.0 pts
0
Does not identify best practices, common mistakes, or ways to avoid for Administrative Staff.
75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Staff
75.0 pts
5
Identifies and accurately describes 3 or more best practices; correctly identifies 4 or more common mistakes; clearly and correctly describes multiple ways to avoid mistakes.
67.0 pts
4
Identifies and accurately describes at least 3 best practices; correctly identifies at least 4 common mistakes; correctly describes some ways to avoid mistakes.
60.0 pts
3
Identifies and accurately describes 2-3 best practices; correctly identifies 3- 4 common mistakes; correctly describes at least one way to avoid mistakes.
52.0 pts
2
Identifies and somewhat inaccurately describes 2-3 best practices; somewhat incorrectly identifies 3- 4 common mistakes; or incorrectly describes ways to avoid mistakes.
45.0 pts
1
Inaccurately describes best practices; incorrectly identifies common mistakes; and incorrectly describes ways to avoid mistakes.
0.0 pts
0
Does not identify best practices, common mistakes, or ways to avoid for Clinical Staff.
75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20.0 pts
5
Paper is 2-3 pages; includes an introduction; clearly divided by administrative and clinical staff; best practices and common mistakes are clearly and accurately identified.
18.0 pts
4
Paper is 2-3 pages; includes an introduction; clearly divided by administrative and clinical staff; best practices and common mistakes are identified.
16.0 pts
3
Paper is 2-3 pages; includes a brief introduction; clearly divided by administrative and clinical staff; best practices and common mistakes are identified.
14.0 pts
2
Paper is 1-2 pages; includes a very brief; divided by administrative and clinical staff; best practices and common mistakes are identified.
12.0 pts
1
Paper is 1-2 pages; includes a very brief introduction; paper is not divided by administrative and clinical staff; or best practices and common mistakes are not identified or are missing.
0.0 pts
0
Does not appropriately organize the paper.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting style, grammar, spelling and APA formatting
10.0 pts
5
Writing is highly professional and completely error free in grammar, spelling and APA formatting, citations and 3 or more references.
9.0 pts
2
Writing is mostly professional; a few very minor errors noted in grammar, spelling, or APA formatting, citations and at least 3 references.
8.0 pts
3
Writing is somewhat professional; a few minor errors noted in grammar, spelling, and APA formatting, citations and 2-3 references.
7.0 pts
2
Writing is somewhat unprofessional; several errors noted in grammar, spelling, or APA formatting, citations and 1-2 references.
6.0 pts
1
Writing is somewhat unprofessional; some major errors noted in grammar, spelling, and APA formatting, citations and only 1 reference.
0.0 pts
0
Writing is very unprofessional; many major errors in grammar, spelling, and APA formatting, citations and no references.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0
The post Herzing University Online Wk 7 Electronic Health Record Documentation Paper first appeared on cipdpro.co.uk .Herzing University Online Wk 7 Electronic Health Record Documentation Paper was first posted on March 1, 2024 at 4:54 am.©2019 "cipdpro.co.uk ". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at admin@cipdpro.co.uk
"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.
Discount Code: CIPD30
Click ORDER NOW..
