Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice.
Reading Research LiteratureGuidelines and Grading Rubric Week 5PURPOSEThe student will read research literature to determine the research purpose question design population sample limitations data collection and analysis.COURSE OUTCOMESThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and 8)CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)REQUIREMENTS1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.George S. & Thomas S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(5) 1092-1100.https://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-liveHunt C. Sanderson B. Ellison K. (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing 23(4) 231-237.https://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live. Your paper does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however you are expected to use correct grammar spelling syntax and write in complete sentences.GRADING CRITERIACategory Points % DescriptionQuestion 1 10 4% Identifies the purpose of the research article.Question 2 10 4% Identifies the research question implied in the study.Question 3 10 4% Describes the research design of the study.Question 4 10 4% Identifies and describes the population.Question 5 10 4% Was the sample adequate for the research designQuestion 6 10 4% Describe the data collection procedureQuestion 7 10 4% How were the data analyzedQuestion 8 10 4% Describes the limitations in the study.Question 9 10 4% Describes the authors conclusions.Question 10 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field.Question 11 10 5% Identifies the purpose of the research article.Question 12 10 5% Identifies the research question implied in the study.Question 13 10 5% Describes the research design of the study.Question 14 10 5% Identifies characteristics of quantitative study.Question 15 10 5% Was the sample adequate for the research designQuestion 16 10 5% Describe the data collection procedureQuestion 17 10 5% How were the data analyzedQuestion 18 10 5% Describes the limitations in the study.Question 19 10 5% Describes the authors conclusions.Question 20 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field.Style and Writing 25 11% Names file includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar spelling or syntax errors.Total 225 points 100%GRADING RUBRICAssignment Criteria A(92-100%)Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance B(84-91%)Very Good or High Level of Performance C76-83%)Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance F0-75%)Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance PtsQuestion 1Purpose(10 points) Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.910 points Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article.8 points Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.7 points Does not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.06 points /10Question 2Research question(10 points) Correctly identifies the research question in the study or identifies the implied question or indicates that no research question was given.910 points Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.8 points Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.7 points Does not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.06 points /10Question 3Research design(10 points) Correctly describes the research design of the study910 points Mostly describes the research design of the study.8 points Somewhat describes the research design of the study.7 points Does not describe the design of the study or inaccurately identifies it.06 points /10Question 4Population(10 points) Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.910 points Mostly describes identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.8 points Somewhat identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.7 points Does not identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.06 points /10Question 5Sample(10 points) Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.910 points Mostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied8 points Somewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied7 points Doesnt answer the question or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.06 points /10Question 6Data collection(10 points) Correctly describes the data collection procedure.910 points Mostly describes the data collection procedure.8 points Somewhat describes the data collection procedure.7 points Doesnt answer the question or misunderstands the data collection procedure.06 points /10Question 7Data analysis(10 points) Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.910 points Partially describes how the data was analyzed.8 points Minimally describes how the data was analyzed.7 points Incorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer06 points /10Question 8Limitations(10 points) Correctly describes the limitations in the study.910 points Mostly describes the limitations in the study8 points Somewhat describes the limitations in the study.7 points Incorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer06 points /10Question 9Conclusions(10 points) Correctly describes the authors conclusions910 points Mostly describes the authors conclusions8 points Somewhat describes the authors conclusions7 points Incorrectly describes the authors conclusions or does not answer question06 points /10Question 10Advances knowledge(10 points) Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.910 points Mostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.8 points Somewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.7 points Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question.06 points /10Question 11Purpose(10 points) Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.910 points Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article.8 points Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.7 points Does not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.06 points /10Question 12Research question(10 points) Correctly identifies the research question in the study or identifies the implied question or indicates that no research question was given.910 points Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.8 points Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.7 points Does not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.06 points /10Question 13Research design(10 points) Correctly describes the research design of the study910 points Mostly describes the research design of the study.8 points Somewhat describes the research design of the study.7 points Does not describe the design of the study or inaccurately identifies it.06 points /10Question 14Population(10 points) Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.910 points Mostly describes identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.8 points Somewhat identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.7 points Does not identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.06 points /10Question 15Sample(10 points) Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.910 points Mostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied8 points Somewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied7 points Doesnt answer the question or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.06 points /10Question 16Data collection(10 points) Correctly describes the data collection procedure.910 points Mostly describes the data collection procedure.8 points Somewhat describes the data collection procedure.7 points Doesnt answer the question or misunderstands the data collection procedure.06 points /10Question 17Data Analysis(10 points) Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.910 points Partially describes how the data was analyzed.8 points Minimally describes how the data was analyzed.7 points Incorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer06 points /10Question 18Limitations(10 points) Correctly describes the limitations in the study.910 points Mostly describes the limitations in the study8 points Somewhat describes the limitations in the study.7 points Incorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer06 points /10Question 19Conclusions(10 points) Correctly describes the authors conclusions910 points Mostly describes the authors conclusions8 points Somewhat describes the authors conclusions7 points Incorrectly describes the authors conclusions or does not answer question06 points /10Question 20Advances knowledge(10 points) Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.910 points Mostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.8 points Somewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.7 points Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question.06 points /10Style and Writing(25 pts) Correctly names file includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar spelling or syntax errors.2325 points One to two errors in grammar spelling and syntax.2122 points Three to four errors in grammar spelling and syntax1920 points Five or more errors in grammar spelling and syntax.018 points /25Reading Research LiteratureType your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar spelling and syntax. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment is included in these details.Title: RRLName: [replace this text with your name] The following questions pertain to:George S. & Thomas S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(5) 1092-1100.https://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live1) What is the purpose of this research?2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.3) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so give a description.4) Describe the population (sample) for this study.5) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?6) Describe the data collection procedure.7) How were the data analyzed after collection?8) Discuss the limitations found in the study.9) Discuss the authors conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?10) How does this advance knowledge in the field?The following questions pertain to:Hunt C. Sanderson B. Ellison K. (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing 23(4) 231-237.https://proxy.devry.edu/login?url=https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00008484-201407000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y11) What is the purpose of this research?12) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.13) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so give a description.14) Describe the population (sample) for this study.15) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?16) Describe the data collection procedure.17) How were the data analyzed?18) Discuss the limitations found in the study?19) Discuss the authors conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?20) How does this advance knowledge in the field.
Like this:Like Loading…
"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.
Discount Code: CIPD30
WHATSAPP CHAT: +1 (781) 253-4162
Click ORDER NOW..
