Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care.
Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care.
PurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the skills of the professional nurse as a teacher and educator. You are to prepare a guide that will serve as a handoutto assist a specific patient that you identify. Your guide or handout should help this patient find and evaluate reliable and accurate information on the Internet (websites)related to his or her disease process or diagnosis.You will develop the guide using Microsoft PowerPoint. PowerPoint is a versatile application that lets you design slideshows and handouts. For this assignment, you willbe using PowerPoint to create a guide or handout that you may print and give to patients and families. You will be submitting this PowerPoint file to the Dropbox.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome(s):CO #8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO #8)PointsThis assignment is worth a total of 175 points.Due DateThe Patient Guide to the WWW PowerPoint assignment is due at the end of Week 2. Submit your completed assignment to the Patient Guide to the WWW basket in theDropbox by Sunday; 11:59 p.m. mountain time. You may consult the Policies, under the Course Home tab, for details regarding late assignments. Late assignments willresult in loss of points. Post questions about this assignment in the weekly Q & A Forum.DirectionsA. Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create four slides, which will be the basis of the guide or handout. You are encouraged to cite your source(s) as it relates to your criteriaslide. Other citations are permitted, but this is not a requirement for the assignment.1)Scenario Slide: This slide should include your name. Next, outline a brief scenario, then identify a patient who is seeking information about a specific disease processor diagnosis. Be sure to include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and the patient or family member’s readiness to learn. Be specific.Example:Scenario for Mr. JonesJane Doe (your name here)· Mr. Jones is a 54-year-old male recently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.· His wife has accompanied him to the oncologist’s office.· Both have a high school education.· Mr. Jones has no interest in his diagnosis; his father died at an early age from pancreatic cancer, and he thinks nothing can be done. Ask a Question (https://www.hometaskguru.com/question/post)Search Home (https://www.hometaskguru.com/) / Main Subjects (https://www.hometaskguru.com/browse/main)/ Health Care (https://www.hometaskguru.com/browse/subject/19/Health-Care)/ General Health Care (https://www.hometaskguru.com/browse/subcategory/253/General-Health-Care) / Question on General Health CareQUESTIONInappropriate content? Let us know. (https://www.hometaskguru.com/home/report/q/105110)DEVRY NR361 WEEK 2,4 AND 6 HOMEWORKAsked by sharpieDated: 6th Nov’15 03:46 PMBounty offered: $65.00Search for existing questions and tutorials…SupportHello! How can I help you?(Note: This is a paid service)Type here and press enter..Tutor Support – OnlinePowered by tawk.to10/9/2017 DEVRY NR361 WEEK 2,4 AND 6 HOMEWORK – SKU 105110https://www.hometaskguru.com/question/view/105110/DEVRY-NR361-WEEK-24-AND-6-HOMEWORK 2/13· Mrs. Jones is greatly interested in any treatment; she has been searching on the Internet for alternative cures.· Mrs. Jones has asked the nurse for help on how to determine whether a website is credible.2)Criteria Slide: This slide should address at least four (4) criteria used to evaluate websites. This information was presented in NR351: Transitions in ProfessionalNursing and in various articles, your text, and other references. The task is to explain how to determine the credibility of websites and teach it to the patient and/orcaregiver described in the Scenario Slide. Concentrate on evaluation of information,not how to search. Assume that the patient or caregiver has basic Internet searchingskills, a computer in the home, and can enter words in the query box in a search engine such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, and so forth. The idea is to teach your patientshow to evaluate websites (suspect and credible) as they relate to a specific disease process or diagnosis.The format of the criteria should be logical and easy to read, for example, a table, checklist, or Q & A. Be creative! Language should be appropriate for the educationallevel of the audience, in other words, the patient and/or caregiver as described in the Scenario Slide. Note: This is the only slide that requires a citation.3)Suspect Site Slide: This slide should give the name and description of a suspect website. The suspect website must be related to the disease or diagnosis identifiedin the scenario. However, the site does not meet the criteria for a credible site, for example, gives inaccurate information, and so forth. You must provide a working link tothe site. Wikipedia is not acceptable! Explain why the site is suspect based on the criteria you outlined in the Criteria Slide.4)Credible Site Slide: This slide should give the name and description of a credible website that you would recommend to the patient and/or caregiver/family member.The website must be appropriate for the general public and address the disease process or diagnosis identified in the Scenario Slide. Avoid sites that are aimed athealthcare professionals. Explain why the site is credible based on criteria that you outlined in the Criteria Slide.B. If you need assistance using PowerPoint, search tutorials about how to use PowerPoint on the Microsoft Office site.C. The following are the scholarly writing requirements for this assignment:a. Your name appears on the Scenario Slide.b. Four slides should be submitted. Points will be deducted for additional slides.c. The four slides pertain to theI. scenario;II. criteria for selection of credible sites;III. suspect site; andIV. credible site.d. The links for the suspect and credible sites are working and formatted correctly.e. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct with no spelling or grammatical errors.f. Graphics, colored slides, and interesting backgrounds are welcome; however, they are not part of the criteria for this assignment and are not considered for gradingpurposes.D. Review the section on Academic Honesty found in the RNBSN Policies. All work must be original (in your own words) unless properly cited.Grading CriteriaCategory Points % DescriptionScenario Slide 35 20% Scenario is clear and concise, including a disease process or diagnosis as well as the nurse’s assessment of learning needsand readiness to learn.Criteria Slide 40 23% Format of criteria is logical and easy to read, for example, a table, checklist, or Q & A. Criteria for websites are clear andconcise. Specific citation for criteria is noted.Suspect Website Slide 40 23% Suspect site is not appropriate for general public, gives inaccurate information, or does not address identified needs ofpatient/caregiver or the diagnosis/disease indicated.Suspect Website SlideWorking Link 5 2.5% Link to the suspect site is operational.Credible Website Slide 40 23% Credible website selected is appropriate for general public. Site addresses disease or diagnosis and offers general informationfor the public.Credible Website WorkingLink 5 2.5% Link to recommended site is operational.Scholarly Writing andFormatting 10 6%· Name of student appears on Scenario Slide or Cover Slide· Four slides are provided:o Scenarioo Criteriao Suspect Siteo Credible Site· Punctuation and sentence structure are correct.· Evidence of spell and grammar checkTotal 175points 100%A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment CriteriaSupportHello! How can I help you?(Note: This is a paid service)Type here and press enter..Tutor Support – OnlinePowered by tawk.to10/9/2017 DEVRY NR361 WEEK 2,4 AND 6 HOMEWORK – SKU 105110https://www.hometaskguru.com/question/view/105110/DEVRY-NR361-WEEK-24-AND-6-HOMEWORK 3/13AOutstanding or Highest Level of PerformanceBVery Good or High Level of PerformanceCCompetent or Satisfactory Level of PerformanceFPoor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of PerformanceScenario Slide35 pointsScenario is a clear and concise description of patient with a specific disease or diagnosis who is seeking information, including the nurse’s assessment of learning needsand readiness to learn.32–35 pointsScenario is not clear and concise with description of patient with specific disease or diagnosis. Scenario does not describe the nurse’s assessment of learning needs ORdoes not include readiness to learn.30–31 pointsScenario exceeds more than one slide.Scenario does not describe assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn.Description of disease process or diagnosis is missing.27–29 pointsScenario exceeds more than one slide. Description of disease process or diagnosis is missing. Learning needs and/or readiness to learn are not addressed.Demographic information is missing.0–26 pointsCriteria Slide40 pointsAt least four criteria are included and are logical and easy to read; for example, a table, checklist, or Q & A. Citation is provided.37–40 pointsThree criteria are included and are not logical or easy to read. Formatting is not apparent. Citation is missing.34–36 pointsTwo criteria are included and are not logical or easy to read. Formatting is incorrect. Citation is missing.30–33 pointsOnly one criterion is included. Formatting is incorrect. Citation is missing.0–29 pointsSuspect Website Slide40 pointsSuspect website is appropriate for general public and clearly identifies areas of concern based on Criteria Slide.37–40 pointsSuspect website is appropriate for general public but areas of concern related to Criteria Slide are difficult to determine.34–36 pointsSuspect website is not appropriate for general public but areas of concern related to Criteria Slide are apparent.30–33 pointsSuspect website is not appropriate for general public and areas of concern related to Criteria Slide are NOT apparent.0–29 pointsSuspect Website Slide Working Link5 pointsLink to suspect site is operational and leads to indicated site.5 pointsLink to suspect site is non-operational but placing URL in browser leads to indicated site.4 pointsLink to suspect site is non-operational and placing URL in browser does NOT lead to indicated site.SupportHello! How can I help you?(Note: This is a paid service)Type here and press enter..Tutor Support – OnlinePowered by tawk.to10/9/2017 DEVRY NR361 WEEK 2,4 AND 6 HOMEWORK – SKU 105110https://www.hometaskguru.com/question/view/105110/DEVRY-NR361-WEEK-24-AND-6-HOMEWORK 4/133 pointsLink for suspect site is not provided.0–2 pointsCredible Website Slide40 pointsCredible website is appropriate for general public. Site is directly related to disease process or diagnosis and offers appropriate information. Itclearly identifies areas ofconcern based on Criteria Slide.37–40 pointsCredible website is geared to the healthcare provider rather than the general public. It addresses disease process or diagnosis but does offer appropriate information forthe general public.Does not identify areas of concern based on Criteria Slide.34–36 pointsCredible website is geared to the healthcare provider rather than the general public. It addresses disease process or diagnosis but does not offer any appropriateinformation for the general public. Areas of concern based on Criteria Slide are not apparent.30–33 pointsWebsite chosen is not credible and the evaluation does not relate to the criteria indicated on Criteria Slide.0–29 pointsCredible Website Slide Working Link5 pointsLink to credible site is operational and leads to indicated site.5 pointsLink to credible site is non-operational but placing URL in browser leads to indicated site.4 pointsLink to credible site is non-operational and placing URL in browser does NOT lead to indicated site.3 pointsLink for credible site is not provided.0–2 pointsScholarly Writing and Formatting10 points· Name of student appears on Scenario Slide or Cover Slide.· Four slides are provided:o Scenarioo Criteriao Suspect Websiteo Credible Website· Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct.· Evidence of spell and grammar check.9–10 points· No student identification noted.· Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted.· Minimal indicators of spelling or grammar errors (red or green wavy lines).8 points· No student identification noted.· Several errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted.· Several indicators of spelling or grammar errors (red or green wavy lines).7 points· No student identification noted.· Multiple typos noted.· Multiple grammar and punctuation errors noted.· No evidence of proofreading prior to submitting assignment.
Like this:Like Loading…