CRJ330 Mod 4 True Experimental Design Research Essay

in /by

CRJ330 Mod 4 True Experimental Design Research Essay

True Experimental Design

Identify how prison officials could use a true experimental design if they wanted to test the impact of a new rehabilitation program designed to be administered to inmates in the four weeks leading up to their release. Be sure to identify the elements of a true experiment and specifically how the impact of the program would be tested.

Requirements:

Review the Module 4 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment.

Rubric

CRJ330 Mod 4 CT
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in either assessing surveys or experimental design.

 12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least three credible sources, as specified in description.

 4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates two credible sources, as specified in description.

 3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one credible source, as specified in description.

 2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

 8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

 6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

 4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

 4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

 3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

 2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.


Discount Code: CIPD30


WHATSAPP CHAT: +1 (781) 253-4162


Click ORDER NOW..

order custom paper