A Comparison of Different Evidence-Based Practice Models in Nursing – nursinghomeworks
Nursing is a profession that relies on knowledge, skills, and compassion to provide the best care for patients. One of the most important approaches in modern nursing is evidence-based practice, often called EBP. Evidence-based practice means making clinical decisions based on the best available research, the nurse’s experience, and the preferences and needs of the patient. To help nurses use evidence in a structured and reliable way, different EBP models have been developed. These models provide step-by-step guidance on how to find, evaluate, and apply research in practice. Comparing different EBP models is helpful because it shows how each one supports nurses in different settings. Three well-known models include the Iowa Model, the Johns Hopkins Model, and the ACE Star Model. While all aim to improve patient outcomes, they each approach the process in unique ways.
The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice is one of the most widely used frameworks. It begins by identifying a problem in practice or a new knowledge trigger. For example, a nurse might notice that many patients in a hospital are developing pressure injuries and wonder how to reduce the numbers. The Iowa Model guides the nurse to gather evidence about best practices for preventing pressure injuries, evaluate the quality of that evidence, and decide if it is strong enough to change current practice. Once the evidence is reviewed, the model emphasizes piloting the change before making it permanent. This means trying the new method with a small group of patients to see if it works well in that setting. If successful, the change can be spread across the whole organization. The Iowa Model is very practical because it focuses on real problems nurses face in daily care and provides a structured way to test solutions.
The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model is another popular framework. This model uses a three-step process called PET, which stands for Practice question, Evidence, and Translation. The first step is to clearly define the practice question. Nurses and teams ask specific questions using structured formats, such as “In hospitalized patients, does turning every two hours reduce the risk of pressure injuries compared to standard care?” The second step is to gather and analyze the best available evidence, including research studies, expert opinions, and guidelines. The third step, translation, involves putting the evidence into practice by creating action plans, educating staff, and evaluating outcomes. This model is very useful because it provides clear tools for formulating questions and rating the strength of evidence. It helps nurses feel confident that they are using reliable information before making changes.
The ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation offers a different perspective by focusing on how knowledge moves through different stages before becoming part of practice. The model uses the image of a star with five points, each representing a stage. The first stage is discovery, where new knowledge is created through research. The second is evidence summary, where research is combined and summarized. The third stage is translation, where evidence is turned into guidelines or protocols. The fourth is integration, where those guidelines are put into practice. The final stage is evaluation, where the impact on patient outcomes is measured. The ACE Star Model highlights that evidence-based practice is not just about finding a single research study but about transforming a large body of knowledge into something usable in daily nursing care. This model is especially helpful in showing the bigger picture of how evidence moves from research to bedside practice.
When comparing these three models, it is clear that they share the same goal: improving patient care by using the best available evidence. However, each model has strengths that make it better suited for certain situations. The Iowa Model is highly practical for solving day-to-day problems in nursing practice and works well in settings where pilot testing is possible. The Johns Hopkins Model is strong in teaching nurses how to ask good clinical questions and evaluate evidence in a systematic way. The ACE Star Model is useful for understanding the overall process of how knowledge becomes part of practice and helps connect individual nurses to the broader world of research and policy.
Despite their differences, all these models emphasize the importance of teamwork, critical thinking, and continuous evaluation. Nurses rarely work alone when applying evidence. They need to collaborate with other healthcare professionals, leaders, and sometimes even patients to ensure that new practices are safe and effective. These models also remind nurses that evidence-based practice is an ongoing process. It is not about making one change and then stopping, but about constantly looking for new ways to improve care.
In conclusion, comparing different evidence-based practice models in nursing shows that while the goal is the same, the path can look different. The Iowa Model focuses on solving real clinical problems through pilot testing, the Johns Hopkins Model emphasizes structured questions and translation, and the ACE Star Model highlights the movement of knowledge from research to practice. By understanding and using these models, nurses can choose the approach that best fits their clinical setting and patient needs. Ultimately, all three models support the core mission of nursing: to provide safe, effective, and compassionate care grounded in the best available evidence.
"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.
Discount Code: CIPD30
Click ORDER NOW..
